This all started because (apparently) people love a competition,
comparison or challenge and I love a project, especially a powered-two-wheeled
sort of project. Which is a better commuter - a scooter or a motorcycle? I have
been asked this question more times than I can count and it has been the subject
of discussion and downright argument at various shops, garages and bars. Yeah -
usually bars. This is an attempt to answer that question.
I make no secret of my affinity for scooters (this IS the Just Gotta
Scoot website after all) but I have been riding motorcycles for longer and
still own a few bikes. To make this a relatively valid comparison, I wanted to
begin with two machines of similar size and cost. I own both the 2006 Kymco
People 250 and the 2005 Kawasaki Ninja 250 utilized here. I wanted both machines
to be set up with commuting as the primary function. I commute at least 24 miles
(round trip) six days per week and sometimes need to cover upwards of a
100 miles in a day. Most days I have the option to select city streets,
freeways, or surface roads of varying speeds.
I live in Minnesota and that means months of miserable weather. I have
good cold weather equipment and will ride in the winter if the roads are
clear. I don't ride on icy, snowy roads.
Let's start with a comparison of the specifications of the machines. The chart
below includes the two machines utilized here as well as their new (2010)
Looking only at the specs, the machines aren't that different, they ride on 16
inch tires, have similar engine sizes, weight and seat heights. Of course they
are really VERY different machines that go way beyond their specifications.
I purchased this machine new and have truly enjoyed it. The only thing I did to
set it up for commuting was add a topcase. In this case a Givi. It is otherwise
stock. This particular machine is no longer available new from Kymco. It has
been replaced by the People 'S' 250 version. The
new version has a more angular body shape and a few enhancements including
triple-disc brakes. The People 250 has a liquid-cooled engine and transmits
power to the rear wheel by means of a CVT or Continuously Variable Transmission.
This configuration involves a variator, clutch and belt. The end result is a
smooth transmission with no manual clutch for the rider to operate - just twist
the throttle and go. The People 250 is very responsive and has a nice powerband
with plenty of acceleration from off the line up to about 60 MPH. The top speed
is about 80 MPH and it takes a bit to get there. The speedometer reads
optimistic. That is to say that the speed indicated by the speedometer is
slightly faster than the actual speed as verified by GPS. For the Kymco 250, the
speedometer is 7% - 8% optimistic. My fuel economy has ranged from 58
Miles-Per-Gallon to 75 MPG. When ridden exclusively around town and taking it
easy on the throttle, the People 250 can get very good mileage. At highway
speeds, mileage drops off a good bit. My average for my mixed commute is 62 MPG.
Storage on the People 250 is very good. There is a hook on the inside front
legshield and I often hang re-usable
fabric shopping bags there, resting the bottom of the bags on the flooorboards
with my legs on either side of the bags. There is lots of storage space under
the seat and the addition of the topcase gives me a LOT of places to put things
during my commute. I have also strapped a lot of stuff on the passenger seat.
The rear luggage rack is standard equipment on the Kymco People 250. The new 'S'
version of the People 250 also has a very usable rear rack right from the
The Kymco People 250 is comfortable and easy to mount. The flat floorboards and
step-through design mean that "swinging a leg" over the machine is NOT a
mandatory part of getting on and off. The automatic transmission is a commuter's
dream come true. No matter the traffic conditions, the People 250 is easy to
operate and responsive. Protection from the elements is quite good - when riding
I feel sheltered from the shoulder on down when in motion. Road grime and rain
hardly bother me. Acceleration is strong and I have no issue at all keeping up
with traffic. From about 60 MPH to the top of 80 MPH acceleration is slow. Not
easy to pass a big truck when doing 65 MPH uphill on the freeway. Luckily, that
situation almost never comes up while commuting.
I acquired this machine used with low miles in good condition. With basically
the same design in use from 1986 to 2007, there are LOTS of good used Ninja 250s
out there. In the motorcycle world, a model doesn't last this long unless it
works very well. The design of the new model Ninja 250 is different and more
like a sport-bike with a taller seat and more aggressive riding position.
Often touted as a great beginner's bike, the Ninja 250 is an
extremely capable machine that is loads of fun to ride. It is certainly sporty
in looks and riding position, but not extremely so. This bike is not the first "Ninjette"
(or baby Ninja) in the family - my wife Beverly owned one a few years
Beverly had a Ninja and a Honda Rebel 450 as her first bikes when she got her
motorcycle endorsement. Both were very fine machines, but she never really
"took" to motorcycles and now rides scooters instead.
The Ninja in its purely stock form could certainly be pressed into service as a
commuter, but I wanted to set the bike up to be specifically focused on this
Time to get out the tool box (and chequebook). In order for the Ninja to
be comfortable for me, it needed a taller windscreen, risers for the controls
and some luggage capacity. I will go into more depth about this conversion in a
separate article on a different (motorcycle focused) venue. Suffice to
say that my Ninja 250 is now a very nice commuting machine.
There is no "native" storage on a stock Ninja 250. A lot of people who commute
on motorcycles make due with what they can carry on their own body by means of a
messenger bag or backpack. Some will add soft luggage such as a tank bag, tail
bag or saddle bags. None of these would work for me as I needed hard, lockable
storage that could be left on the bike. In addition to that storage, I do often
carry a messenger bag
during my commute.
The Ninja 250 has a high-revving twin-cylinder liquid-cooled engine that gets
power to the back wheel by means of a chain through a 6-speed manual
transmission. Like most any other motorcycle, this means shifting - and
sometimes lots and lots of shifting - during my commute. In most circumstances
this isn't a problem and I quite enjoy it. In stop-and-go-freeway-crawling
shifting can get tedious quickly. The Ninja 250 redlines at something like
13,000 RPMs and it is necessary to be in the upper end of the range to get any
kind of acceleration out of it. If that sounds like a chore I didn't mean it
that way, it's a blast to wring out that bullet-proof little motor. Running at
around 7,000 to 8,000 RPMs in sixth gear at freeway speeds does take some
getting used to. Just wind it out and let it do it's thing. The speedometer on
my Ninja is (like the Kymco People) optimistic. It reads close to 10%
faster than actual speed. The top speed I've verified on GPS was 93 MPH - much
faster than I'd EVER need to go on my commute. Highway speed passing is no
problem as long as one downshifts (often two gears) and revs out the
motor. Fuel economy is very good at 55 MPG - 65 MPG. My average during my
commute is 58 MPG.
I came up with a scoring system based on relative performance in each category.
The "perfect" score in each category is based on suitability as a commuter.
Price/Value - This is the top category and points are based on
availability, cost of comparable machines and any modifications needed. The
Ninja did better than the People because even with all the extra accessories
installed the total price is still lower.
Reliability - Properly maintained, neither machine will let you
down - a tie.
Maintenance - The People did better here than the Ninja with fewer
required maintenance tasks and ease of performing them. Cleaning the carburetors
on the Ninja was a chore - mostly because of how tough they are to get at. It's
pretty simple on the People.
Insurance - Both machines have the same coverage with the same
rider, but the People costs less than the Ninja.
Storage Capacity - Even with the addition of a topcase, the Ninja
just can't compete with the People in this category.
Comfort - Close call, but the People just edged out the Ninja
because of the step-through design and upright seating position.
Ease of Operation - For commuting, automatic wins out over manual
Fuel Economy - Dead even - both machines get class-leading
Fun Factor - Sorry Kymco People, the Ninja is just plain more fun
I rode both machines a great deal over several months. Sometimes I would
day, sometimes I would ride one or the other for several days in a row. Both
machines saw all kinds of roads, speeds and weather conditions. I kept notes and
built the scoring as impartially as possible. The Kymco People 250 was the
winner by a narrow margin. I would be happy with either machine as a
commuter. The automatic transmission and storage capacity of the People were
what tipped the scale.
When I walk into the garage in the morning with both machines looking at me,
begging to be ridden, I usually go to the People if I have a lot to do that day
and don't know what kind of traffic I'll be in or what I might have to haul with
me. On days when I could get on a faster road without a lot of pressure for
time, I'll hop on the Ninja.